Talk:Experimental Financial - Revision history

Kurt Gee at 21:03, 22 February 2011

2011-02-22T21:03:25Z

Daw44 at 16:39, 29 January 2009

2009-01-29T16:39:41Z

Roys: New page: So, I'm thinking about doing some major adjusting to this page. For example, I was thinking about lumping all of the researchers into one category and then just giving a brief 'blurb' abo...

2009-01-29T16:32:33Z

New page: So, I'm thinking about doing some major adjusting to this page. For example, I was thinking about lumping all of the researchers into one category and then just giving a brief 'blurb' abo...

New page

So, I'm thinking about doing some major adjusting to this page. For example, I was thinking about lumping all of the researchers into one category and then just giving a brief 'blurb' about the economic and psychological motivations. In this way, the page would more resemble the information shown on the Archival Financial page. Any objections/counter points to this approach? [[Roys|Roys]] 09:32, 29 January 2009 (MST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:03, 22 February 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	So, I'm thinking about doing some major adjusting to this page. For example, I was thinking about lumping all of the researchers into one category and then just giving a brief 'blurb' about the economic and psychological motivations. In this way, the page would more resemble the information shown on the Archival Financial page. Any objections/counter points to this approach? ~~[[Roys\|Roys]] 09:32, 29 January 2009 (MST)~~	+	So, I'm thinking about doing some major adjusting to this page. For example, I was thinking about lumping all of the researchers into one category and then just giving a brief 'blurb' about the economic and psychological motivations. In this way, the page would more resemble the information shown on the Archival Financial page. Any objections/counter points to this approach?
	: I say go for it. I do think it is important to highlight the difference in experimental economics and JDM type research methodologies. See what you can come up with and then we'll take a look! [[User:Daw44\|Daw44]] 09:39, 29 January 2009 (MST)		: I say go for it. I do think it is important to highlight the difference in experimental economics and JDM type research methodologies. See what you can come up with and then we'll take a look! [[User:Daw44\|Daw44]] 09:39, 29 January 2009 (MST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:39, 29 January 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	So, I'm thinking about doing some major adjusting to this page. For example, I was thinking about lumping all of the researchers into one category and then just giving a brief 'blurb' about the economic and psychological motivations. In this way, the page would more resemble the information shown on the Archival Financial page. Any objections/counter points to this approach? [[Roys\|Roys]] 09:32, 29 January 2009 (MST)		So, I'm thinking about doing some major adjusting to this page. For example, I was thinking about lumping all of the researchers into one category and then just giving a brief 'blurb' about the economic and psychological motivations. In this way, the page would more resemble the information shown on the Archival Financial page. Any objections/counter points to this approach? [[Roys\|Roys]] 09:32, 29 January 2009 (MST)
		+	: I say go for it. I do think it is important to highlight the difference in experimental economics and JDM type research methodologies. See what you can come up with and then we'll take a look! [[User:Daw44\|Daw44]] 09:39, 29 January 2009 (MST)