Difference between revisions of "NCAA Tournament Simulated Using Accounting Research Rankings"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | This is what the 2010 NCAA Division I Men's Basketball Championship would look like if the winner of each game was the program with the | + | This is what the 2010 NCAA Division I Men's Basketball Championship would look like if the winner of each game was the program with the most productive accounting researchers over the last 6 years (i.e., the faculty that has produced the most journal articles in the journals included in the studies). Rankings are taken from [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1337755 Coyne, Summers, Williams, and Wood (2010)] paper forthcoming in ''Issues in Accounting Education.'' |
For rankings of the best Ph.D. programs, see [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1574502 Stephens, Summers, Williams, and Wood (2010)] working paper posted on SSRN. | For rankings of the best Ph.D. programs, see [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1574502 Stephens, Summers, Williams, and Wood (2010)] working paper posted on SSRN. | ||
Revision as of 11:49, 1 April 2010
This is what the 2010 NCAA Division I Men's Basketball Championship would look like if the winner of each game was the program with the most productive accounting researchers over the last 6 years (i.e., the faculty that has produced the most journal articles in the journals included in the studies). Rankings are taken from Coyne, Summers, Williams, and Wood (2010) paper forthcoming in Issues in Accounting Education.
For rankings of the best Ph.D. programs, see Stephens, Summers, Williams, and Wood (2010) working paper posted on SSRN.
Note: Rankings differ slightly from the SSRN version in some instances as we have updated all the data and the SSRN paper has not been updated. The results are based on rankings as of December 31, 2009.
