Difference between revisions of "NCAA Tournament Simulated Using Accounting Research Rankings"
(Undo revision 11820 by 213.163.97.20 (Talk)) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | This is what the | + | This is what the NCAA Division I Men's Basketball Championship would look like if the winner of each game was the program with the most productive accounting researchers over the last 6 years (i.e., the faculty that has produced the most journal articles in the journals included in the study). For complete [http://www.byuaccounting.net/rankings/ accounting rankings] visit the companion website (rankings include [http://www.byuaccounting.net/rankings/ University Accounting Rankings] and [http://www.byuaccounting.net/rankings/phdrank/phdrankings.php Ph.D. accounting rankings]). |
| + | ==2011 Simulated Results== | ||
| + | [[Image:2011 NCAA Bracket Accounting Style JPG.JPG]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==2010 Simulated Results== | ||
[[Image:AccountingNCAA.JPG]] | [[Image:AccountingNCAA.JPG]] | ||
Revision as of 08:58, 14 March 2011
This is what the NCAA Division I Men's Basketball Championship would look like if the winner of each game was the program with the most productive accounting researchers over the last 6 years (i.e., the faculty that has produced the most journal articles in the journals included in the study). For complete accounting rankings visit the companion website (rankings include University Accounting Rankings and Ph.D. accounting rankings).
2011 Simulated Results
2010 Simulated Results
