Difference between revisions of "Talk:Experimental Financial"

From Phdwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: So, I'm thinking about doing some major adjusting to this page. For example, I was thinking about lumping all of the researchers into one category and then just giving a brief 'blurb' abo...)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
So, I'm thinking about doing some major adjusting to this page.  For example, I was thinking about lumping all of the researchers into one category and then just giving a brief 'blurb' about the economic and psychological motivations.  In this way, the page would more resemble the information shown on the Archival Financial page.  Any objections/counter points to this approach?  [[Roys|Roys]] 09:32, 29 January 2009 (MST)
 
So, I'm thinking about doing some major adjusting to this page.  For example, I was thinking about lumping all of the researchers into one category and then just giving a brief 'blurb' about the economic and psychological motivations.  In this way, the page would more resemble the information shown on the Archival Financial page.  Any objections/counter points to this approach?  [[Roys|Roys]] 09:32, 29 January 2009 (MST)
 +
: I say go for it.  I do think it is important to highlight the difference in experimental economics and JDM type research methodologies.  See what you can come up with and then we'll take a look! [[User:Daw44|Daw44]] 09:39, 29 January 2009 (MST)

Revision as of 10:39, 29 January 2009

So, I'm thinking about doing some major adjusting to this page. For example, I was thinking about lumping all of the researchers into one category and then just giving a brief 'blurb' about the economic and psychological motivations. In this way, the page would more resemble the information shown on the Archival Financial page. Any objections/counter points to this approach? Roys 09:32, 29 January 2009 (MST)

I say go for it. I do think it is important to highlight the difference in experimental economics and JDM type research methodologies. See what you can come up with and then we'll take a look! Daw44 09:39, 29 January 2009 (MST)