Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ph.D. Prep Track and Doctoral Student Q&A"

From Phdwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I believe we need to combine some of this stuff into similar types of articles.  I think longer articles that answer several questions would be useful.  Here is one idea for mapping the current content into something new.
 
I believe we need to combine some of this stuff into similar types of articles.  I think longer articles that answer several questions would be useful.  Here is one idea for mapping the current content into something new.
  
* Create one article on applying to Ph.D. programs.  None of the articles below seem like they should stand on their own.  Include the following information on that single page (under different headings):
+
* Create one article on [[Applying to a Ph.D. Program]].  None of the articles below seem like they should stand on their own.  Include the following information on that single page (under different headings):
 
** [[What Ph.D. program should I attend?]]
 
** [[What Ph.D. program should I attend?]]
 
** [[What should I expect when I visit a campus?]]
 
** [[What should I expect when I visit a campus?]]
Line 18: Line 18:
 
** [[How do I prepare for comprehensive exams?]]
 
** [[How do I prepare for comprehensive exams?]]
  
* An article about preparation before going into a Ph.D. program:
+
* An article about preparation before going into a Ph.D. program--[[Preparing for a Doctoral Program]]:
 
** [[What will I learn in the Prep Track that I won't learn elsewhere?]] (Should I do the prep track...type part of article)
 
** [[What will I learn in the Prep Track that I won't learn elsewhere?]] (Should I do the prep track...type part of article)
 
** [[Should I get a Ph.D. in a subject area other than accounting?]]
 
** [[Should I get a Ph.D. in a subject area other than accounting?]]

Revision as of 07:28, 24 October 2009

I believe we need to combine some of this stuff into similar types of articles. I think longer articles that answer several questions would be useful. Here is one idea for mapping the current content into something new.




This reduces the article count to 5 different articles and goes into more depth on each one rather than sort of a hodge-podge on all things. Thoughts? Daw44 21:01, 7 October 2009 (UTC)